Free Access
Issue
RAIRO-Theor. Inf. Appl.
Volume 27, Number 3, 1993
Page(s) 183 - 219
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ita/1993270301831
Published online 01 February 2017
  1. 1. A. V. AHO, J. E. HOPCROFT and J. D. ULLMAN, The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms, Addison-Wesley, 1974. [MR: 413592] [Zbl: 0326.68005] [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. C. BATINI, M. LENZERINI and M. MOSCARINI, Views Integration, in Methodology and Tools for Data Base Design, S. CERI Ed., North-Holland, 1983, pp. 57-84. [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. P. A. BERNSTEIN and N. GOODMAN, What Does Boyce-Codd Normal Form Do?, Proc. 6th Internat. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, Montreal, 1980, pp. 245-259. [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. J. BISKUP, Boyce-Codd Normal Form and Object Normal Forms, Information Processing Letters, 1989, 32, pp. 29-33. [MR: 1006560] [Zbl: 0677.68104] [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. J. BISKUP and B. CONVENT, A Formal View Integration Method, Proc. of ACM-SIGMOD Intl. Conf. on Management of Data, 1986, pp. 398-407. [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. J. BISKUP, J. DEMETROVICS, L. O. LIBKIN and I. B. MUCHNIK, On the Relational Database Schemes having Unique Minimal Key, Journal Information Processing and Cybernetics (EIK), 1991, 27, 4, pp. 217-225. [MR: 1110726] [Zbl: 0731.68029] [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. M. A. CASANOVA, R. FAGIN and C. H. PAPADIMITRIOU, Inclusion Dependencies and their Interaction with Functional Dependencies, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1984, 28, 1, pp. 29-59. [MR: 754907] [Zbl: 0586.68082] [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. M. A. CASANOVA and V. M. P. VIDAL, Towards a Sound View Intégration Methodology, Proc. of 2nd ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD Symp, on Principles of Database Systems, 1983, pp. 36-47. [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. A. K. CHANDRA and M. Y. VARDI, The Implication Problem for Functional and Inclusion Dependencies is Undecidable, S.I.A.M. Journal on Computing, 1985, 14, 3, pp. 671-677. [MR: 795938] [Zbl: 0603.68100] [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. C. J. DATE, Referential Integrity, Proc. of the 7th International Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, 1981, pp. 2-12. [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. R. ELMASRI and G. WIEDERHOLD, Data Model Integration using Structural Model, Proc. of ACM-SIGMOD Intl. Conf. on Management of Data, 1979, pp. 191-202. [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. H. J. HERNÁNDEZ and E. P. F. CHAN, A Characterization of Constant-Time Maintainability for BCNF Database Schemes, Proc. ACM-SIGMOD Internat. Conf. on Management of Data, 1988, pp. 209-217. [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. W. KENT, A Simple Guide to Five Normal Forms in Relational Database Theory, Comm. A.C.M, 26, 1983, pp. 120-125. [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. C. H. LE DOUX and D. S. PARKER, Reflections on Boyce-Codd Normal Form, Proc. 8th Internat. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, Mexico City, 1982, pp. 131-141. [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. D. MAIER, The Theory of Relational Databases, Computer Science Press, 1983. [MR: 691493] [Zbl: 0519.68082] [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. J. C. MITCHELL, The Implication Problem for Functional and Inclusion Dependencies, Information and Control, 1983, 56, 3, pp. 154-173. [MR: 735501] [Zbl: 0539.68090] [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. S. L. OSBORN, Normal Forms for Relational Data Bases, Ph. D. Thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. J. PAREDAENS et al., The Structure of the Relational Database Model, Springer-Verlag, 1989. [MR: 997296] [Zbl: 0669.68060] [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. J. D. ULLMAN, Principles of Database Systems, Computer Science Press, 1982. [MR: 669881] [Zbl: 0558.68078] [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. G. VOSSEN, Datenmodelle, Datenbanksprachen und Datenbank-Management-Systeme (in Germain), Addison-Wesley, 1987. [Zbl: 0827.68034] [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. G. VOSSEN, Entwurf und Bearbeitung von Datenbanken im Universalrelationen-Datenmodell, Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 1986. [Zbl: 0635.68118] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.