Free Access
Issue
RAIRO-Theor. Inf. Appl.
Volume 30, Number 1, 1996
Page(s) 31 - 79
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ita/1996300100311
Published online 01 February 2017
  1. 1. D. E. AVISON and G. FITZGERALD, Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. S. ABITEBOUL and R. HULL, IFO: A Formal Semantic Database Model, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1987, 12(4), pp. 525-565. [MR: 920252] [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. J. ADÁMEK, H. HERRLICH and G. E. STRECKER, Abstract and Concrete Categories, Pure and applied mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1990. [MR: 1051419] [Zbl: 0695.18001] [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. G. ARIAV, A Temporally Oriented Data Model, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1986, 11(4), pp. 499-527. [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. C. W. BACHMAN, Data structure diagrams, Data Base, 1969, 1(2), pp. 4-10. [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. M. BARR, Fuzzy sets and topos theory, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 1986, 24, pp. 501-508. [MR: 860861] [Zbl: 0563.03040] [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. M. L. BRODIE, On the development of data models. In M. L. Brodie, J. Mylopoulos and J. W. Schmidt, editors, On Conceptual Modelling, Perspectives from Artificial Intelligence, Databases and Programming Languages, pp. 19-48. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. K. BACLAWSKI, D. SIMOVICI and W. WHITE, A categorical approach to database semantics, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 1994, 4, pp. 147-183. [MR: 1281758] [Zbl: 0854.68029] [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. J. A. BUBENKO, Information System Methodologies - A Research View. In T. W. Olle, H. G. Sol and A. A. Verrijn-Stuart, editors, Information Systems Design Methodologies: Improving the Practice, pp. 289-318. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. M. BARR and C. WELLS, Category Theory for Computing Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1990. [MR: 1094561] [Zbl: 0714.18001] [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. P. P. CHEN, The Entity-Relationship Model: Toward a Unified View of Data, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1976, 1(1), pp. 9-36. [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. E. F. CODD, A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks, Communications of the ACM, 1970, 13(6), pp. 377-387. [Zbl: 0207.18003] [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. G. ENGELS, M. GOGOLLA, U. HOHENSTEIN, K. HÜLSMANN, P. LÖHR-RICHTER, G. SAAKE and H.-D. EHRICH, Conceptual modelling of database applications using an extended ER model, Data & Knowledge Engineering, 1992, 9(4), pp. 157-204. [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. J. J. VAN GRIETHUYSEN, editor, Concepts and Terminology for the Conceptual Schema and the Information Base, Publ. nr. ISO/TC97/SC5-N695, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. T. A. HALPIN, Conceptual Schema and Relational Database Design, Prentice-Hall, Sydney, Australia, 2nd edition, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. M. HAMMER and D. MCLEOD, Database Description with SDM: A Semantic Database Model, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1981, 6(3), pp. 351-386. [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. T. A. HALPIN and M. E. ORLOWSKA, Fact-oriented modelling for data analysis, Journal of Information Systems, 1992, 2(2), pp. 97-119. [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. A. H. M. TER HOFSTEDE, H. A. PROPER and Th. P. VAN DER WEIDE, Formal definition of a conceptual language for the description and manipulation of information models, Information Systems, 1993, 18(7), pp. 489-523. [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. A. H. M. TER HOFSTEDE and Th. P. VAN DER WEIDE, Expressiveness in conceptual data modelling, Data & Knowledge Engineering, 1993, 10(1), pp. 65-100. [Zbl: 0795.68059] [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. C. B. JONES, Systematic Software Development using VDM, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1986. [Zbl: 0584.68008] [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. W. KIM and F. H. LOCHOVSKY, editors, Object-Oriented Concepts, Databases, and Applications, ACM Press, Frontier Series. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. D. MAIER, The Theory of Relational Databases, Computer Science Press, Rockville, Maryland, 1988. [Zbl: 0519.68082] [MR: 691493] [Google Scholar]
  23. 23. J. M. MORRISSEY, Imprecise Information and Uncertainty in Information Systems, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1990, 8(2), pp. 159-180. [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. G. M. NIJSSEN and T. A. HALPIN, Conceptual Schema and Relational Database Design: a fact oriented approach, Prentice-Hall, Sydney, Australia, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. A. PITTS, Fuzzy sets do not form a topos, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1982, 8, pp. 101-104. [MR: 665492] [Zbl: 0499.03051] [Google Scholar]
  26. 26. R. SNODGRASS and I. AHN, Temporal Databases, IEEE Computer, 1986, 19(9), pp. 35-42. [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. D. W. SHIPMAN, The Functional Data Model and the Data Language DAPLEX, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1981, 6(1), pp. 140-173. [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. A. SIEBES, On Complex Objects, PhD thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. R. SNODGRASS, Temporal Databases Status and Research Directions, SIGMOD Record, 1990, 19(4), pp. 83-89. [Google Scholar]
  30. 30. J. M. SPIVEY, Understanding Z: A Specification Language and its Formal Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1988. [MR: 939813] [Zbl: 0658.68005] [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. C. THEODOULIDIS, P. LOUCOPOULOS and B. WANGLER, A conceptual modelling formalism for temporal database applications, Information Systems, 1991, 16(4), pp. 401-416. [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. C. TUIJN, Data Modeling from a Categorical Perspective, PhD thesis, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. T. J. TEOREY, D. YANG and J. P. FRY, A logical design methodology for relational databases using the extended entity-relationship model, ACM Computing Surveys, 1986, 18(2), pp. 197-222. [Zbl: 0641.68172] [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. S. B. ZDONIK and D. MAIER, editors, Readings in Object-Oriented Database Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California, 1990. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.