Issue |
RAIRO-Theor. Inf. Appl.
Volume 45, Number 3, July-September 2011
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 269 - 299 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ita/2011119 | |
Published online | 26 August 2011 |
Deciding knowledge in security protocols under some e-voting theories
1
LIP2, Faculté des Sciences, Tunis, Tunisia. berrima.mouheb@gmail.com
2
LIP2, Institut
National des Sciences Appliquées et de Technologie, Tunis, Tunisia.
3
Loria, INRIA & CNRS, Nancy, France.
Received:
11
December
2009
Accepted:
7
February
2011
In the last decade, formal methods have proved their interest when analyzing security protocols. Security protocols require in particular to reason about the attacker knowledge. Two standard notions are often considered in formal approaches: deducibility and indistinguishability relations. The first notion states whether an attacker can learn the value of a secret, while the latter states whether an attacker can notice some difference between protocol runs with different values of the secret. Several decision procedures have been developed so far for both notions but none of them can be applied in the context of e-voting protocols, which require dedicated cryptographic primitives. In this work, we show that both deduction and indistinguishability are decidable in polynomial time for two theories modeling the primitives of e-voting protocols.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 68Q85
Key words: Security protocols / formal methods / decidability / e-voting / equational theory / deduction / static equivalence
© EDP Sciences, 2011
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.