spacer
EDP Sciences Journals List
Home arrow Document
 
 

|   Abstract  |   PDF (227.7 KB)  |   References  |

RAIRO-Theor. Inf. Appl. 42, 105-119 (2008)
DOI: 10.1051/ita:2007048

Arithmetization of the field of reals with exponentiation extended abstract

Sedki Boughattas and Jean-Pierre Ressayre

CNRS and Paris 7 University, France; bougatas@logique.jussieu.fr


(Published online: 18 January 2008)

Abstract

(1) Shepherdson proved that a discrete unitary commutative semi-ring A+ satisfies IE0 (induction scheme restricted to quantifier free formulas) iff A is integral part of a real closed field; and Berarducci asked about extensions of this criterion when exponentiation is added to the language of rings. Let T range over axiom systems for ordered fields with exponentiation; for three values of T we provide a theory$_{\llcorner} T _{\lrcorner}$ in the language of rings plus exponentiation such that the models (A, expA) of $_{\llcorner} T _{\lrcorner}$ are all integral parts A of models M of T with A+ closed under expM and $\exp_A=\exp_M\upharpoonright A^+$. Namely T = EXP, the basic theory of real exponential fields; T = EXP+ the Rolle and the intermediate value properties for all 2x-polynomials; and T = $T_{\exp}$, the complete theory of the field of reals with exponentiation. (2) $_{\llcorner}$$T_{\exp}$$_{\lrcorner}$ is recursively axiomatizable iff $T_{\exp}$ is decidable. $_{\llcorner}$$T_{\exp}$$_{\lrcorner}$ implies LE0(xy) (least element principle for open formulas in the language $<,+,\times,-1,x^y$) but the reciprocal is an open question. $_{\llcorner}$$T_{\exp}$$_{\lrcorner}$ satisfies "provable polytime witnessing": if $_{\llcorner}$$T_{\exp}$$_{\lrcorner}$ proves $\forall
x\exists y:\vert y\vert<\vert x\vert^k)R(x,y)$ (where $\vert y\vert:=_{\llcorner}$$ {\log(y)}$$_{\lrcorner}$, $k<\omega$ and R is an NP relation), then it proves $\forall x\ R(x,f(x))$ for some polynomial time function f. (3) We introduce "blunt" axioms for Arithmetics: axioms which do as if every real number was a fraction (or even a dyadic number). The falsity of such a contention in the standard model of the integers does not mean inconsistency; and bluntness has both a heuristic interest and a simplifying effect on many questions - in particular we prove that the blunt version of $_{\llcorner}$$T_{\exp}$$_{\lrcorner}$ is a conservative extension of $_{\llcorner}$$T_{\exp}$$_{\lrcorner}$ for sentences in $\forall\Delta_0(x^y)$ (universal quantifications of bounded formulas in the language of rings plus xy). Blunt Arithmetics - which can be extended to a much richer language - could become a useful tool in the non standard approach to discrete geometry, to modelization and to approximate computation with reals.


Mathematics Subject Classification. 03H15

Key words: Computation with reals -- exponentiation -- model theory -- o-minimality


© EDP Sciences 2007